
EU AI Act CISO Responsibilities: What Security Should Own
The EU AI Act names no CISO anywhere. Here's the AI cybersecurity assurance workstream security should own, and the evidence to require for everything else.
Read Article →Latest article
The EU AI Act names no CISO anywhere. Here's the AI cybersecurity assurance workstream security should own, and the evidence to require for everything else.
Read Article →

The EU AI Act names no CISO anywhere. Here's the AI cybersecurity assurance workstream security should own, and the evidence to require for everything else.
Read Article →
The EU AI Act high-risk deadline moved to 2027 and 2028. The evidence work did not. Here is what to prove for one AI system before your next review.
Read Article →
Most AI systems can show they work. Production review asks for evidence: failure modes, testing, controls, ownership, monitoring, and EU AI Act readiness.
Read Article →
EU AI Act compliance for high-risk systems turns on classification, evidence, and timing. What applies, when, and what compliance leads must document.
Read Article →
Test LLMs against EU AI Act requirements with Promptfoo, including Article 5 risks, red-team reports, and remediation steps.
Read Article →
A working view of what an independent adversarial assessment covers, the evidence it produces, and how findings translate into remediation and documentation auditors can use.
Read Article →
Learn what AI red teaming and adversarial testing mean, how they differ from standard security testing, and when organizations need them.
Read Article →No articles match this filter yet.
Book a short scoping call and we'll help you define what to assess, what access is needed, and what evidence would be most useful for your AI security, governance, and compliance teams.